<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Personal Finance Tips &#187; Local Companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourchoiceforchange08.com/tag/local-companies/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourchoiceforchange08.com</link>
	<description>Help Planning your finances</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:47:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Interstate health insurance myths</title>
		<link>http://www.yourchoiceforchange08.com/interstate-health-insurance-myths</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourchoiceforchange08.com/interstate-health-insurance-myths#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bipartisan Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effective System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Insurers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subprime Mortgages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourchoiceforchange08.com/interstate-health-insurance-myths</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The game played by politicians is to take an idea from their own agenda and then frame it in a way that sells it to the other side. When the politicians meet in the middle, bipartisan solutions to problems emerge. This reflects the fact there is no monopoly on good ideas, only simple good solutions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The game played by politicians is to take an idea from their own agenda and then frame it in a way that sells it to the other side. When the politicians meet in the middle, bipartisan solutions to problems emerge. This reflects the fact there is no monopoly on good ideas, only simple good solutions to difficult problems. In the healthcare debate, one of the solutions proposed by the GOP was to allow people to buy their insurance across state lines. This sounds a good idea. As the law stands, every state regulates the sale of insurance within its own borders. This limits the size of the market. If insurers had to compete with each other on a regional or national level, the premium rates would fall and every citizen would get a better deal. Well, let&#8217;s look a little more closely at how it would actually work.</p>
<p>At present, every state has a Department of Insurance to regulate the insurance companies licensed to sell policies. This is a reasonably effective system for consumer protection. But if regional or national insurers could sell policies into many states, it would break the regulatory system. It would no longer be local supervision of local companies. Insurers would decide where to establish and would, of course, choose the states which had the weakest consumer protection regulations, i.e. where they could make the most profit. Think banks and finance companies. These companies broke the US economy and produced the recession because their sales of subprime mortgages and associated derivatives were unregulated. Now apply the same thing to interstate insurance. As a final thought on this issue, remember all US states have different laws and one state cannot enforce another&#8217;s laws. That is sovereignty for you. So the state where an insurer is based cannot protect consumers under another state&#8217;s laws.</p>
<p>Secondly, opening the market across state lines allows insurers to cherry pick the best people to insure. Without regulations to limit the right to discriminate against people for pre-existing conditions and to increase premiums as people get older and fall ill more often, insurers will just take their profit from all the healthy people and forget about the rest. Thus, instead of increasing consumer choice, it would have the reverse effect. Most insurance companies would close their branches in individual states. Those that remained would keep all the aging and less healthy people. As their claims rise, the companies will make a loss and close. Without a law to mandate regional or national companies to offer some health coverage, it is likely the number of uninsured people would rise.</p>
<p>When you add all this up, it is a good thing the GOP&#8217;s proposal was rejected. <a href="http://www.reliablehealthinsurance.net/">Health insurance plans</a> are complicated enough without having to change a whole mass of federal and state laws to allow interstate sales. This is not to say that consumers might benefit if there was more competition in the insurance market generally. With a real free market, properly regulated, consumers would get a better deal both in the terms of coverage and in the premium rates they pay. As it is, you must get multiple quotes to find <a href="http://www.reliablehealthinsurance.net/myths.html">cheap health insurance</a>. Anticipating their profits will take a hit following this reform, insurers have been raising their premium rates. You must shop around to find the most affordable policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourchoiceforchange08.com/interstate-health-insurance-myths/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does every state need its own Department of Insurance?</title>
		<link>http://www.yourchoiceforchange08.com/does-every-state-need-its-own-department-of-insurance</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourchoiceforchange08.com/does-every-state-need-its-own-department-of-insurance#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumers Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enough Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newcomers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidiaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watchdog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourchoiceforchange08.com/does-every-state-need-its-own-department-of-insurance</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Insurance is a slightly nonstandard business in that all the major regulatory functions are left to the individual US states. Federal government has decided to abandon its normal role as the regulator of business to protect the consumers&#8217; rights. Such regulation as does exist is down to the political climate in each state and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insurance is a slightly nonstandard business in that all the major regulatory functions are left to the individual US states. Federal government has decided to abandon its normal role as the regulator of business to protect the consumers&#8217; rights. Such regulation as does exist is down to the political climate in each state and the will of the lawmakers to take on the economic power of the insurance industry. That said, all Departments of Insurance start off equal. Their primary function is to license companies to sell insurance in their state. Unlike other businesses, an insurance company is licensed state-by-state. No company can sell a policy across state lines. That means every national insurer must establish separate subsidiaries in each state and each company must hold a license. There are also minimum capital holdings set by the Department to protect the solvency of the local companies. There must always be enough money held by each company to pay out on the claims made. Some states require actual cash to be available. Others have a formula to prove the availability of money as required. But, for the most part, this is historical. The major players established their presence in multiple states years ago and newcomers moving across state lines are rare. In fact, the general lack of competition in state markets gives no incentive for companies to seek new licenses.</p>
<p>Once all the players hold their licenses, the personality of the Commissioners in charge comes to the fore. Many view their role as political either to run the Department with the lowest possible level of regulation or to be an effective watchdog to protect consumer rights. You can tell which way your local Department is run by logging on to your state&#8217;s website. Some sites are very pro consumer, offering detailed help and advice on how to buy insurance and get a good deal. But the key test lies in the way complaints are handled. Without exception, all Departments accept complaints from people holding policies. In theory, they should all investigate these complaints and apply a judicial process to decide whether the insurer is at fault and, if so, what the remedy should be. For example, Road Island has just imposed a fine of $5,000 on a leading insurer. Following a traffic accident, the insured wanted the repair work done at his regular auto body shop. This was refused by the insurer because the shop was not on their list of approved body shops. Local regulations drawn up by the RI Department allow the insured a free choice of repair facilities. The fine of $5,000 and publicity for it represents a small penalty in itself. But if there were many such fines, the cumulative bad publicity would damage this insurance company&#8217;s reputation and its market share would fall.</p>
<p>The best Departments are completely open about the complaints process, publishing details of the complaints, the identity of the insurance company and whether the complaints were upheld. When you are looking for <a href="http://www.car-insurance-mate.com/">cheap car insurance</a>, this gives you an excellent guide to all the companies&#8217; performance in selling policies and handling claims. Sadly, the majority of Departments do not identify the bad insurance companies by name. The worst do not publish any useful information about complaints. This leaves you in the dark when looking for <a href="http://www.car-insurance-mate.com/articles/department-of-insurance.html">cheap car insurance</a> with a reliable company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourchoiceforchange08.com/does-every-state-need-its-own-department-of-insurance/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

